The Effects of the Industrial Revolution on Society Essay

Frank Garrido THE EFFECTS OF THE NDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ON SOCIETY The Industrial Revolution changed the ways by how the world produced its goods. It was the era when the use of power-driven machines was developed. It also changed our societies from a mainly agricultural society to one in which industry and manufacturing was in control. This had many effects on people’s lives. The Industrial Revolution first got its start in Great Britain, during the 18th century. It was inevitable that the country with the most wealth would lead in this revolution. After it adoption in England, other countries such as Germany, the United States and France joined in this revolution. During this time there were many new technological advancements,†¦show more content†¦The Revolution also affected children. When coal became necessary to fuel steam engines, many people were needed to work in coal mines. Children were hires to go into narrow passageways and pick coal. Boys and girls were put to work doing dangerous things that children should not be expected to do. Children also worked in factories. Their small hands came in handy to retrieve broken threads in machines, however many children lost fingers while doing this. The Industrial Revolution had many negative affects on people. Many people worked from home before the Revolution. Raw materials were delivered to peoples cottages and the weavers would process the wool in their homes. This was an advantage for the workers because they would make their own schedules and work at their own pace; however, for these same reasons, they were disadvantages for business owners. The Industrial Revolution made it possible to move the jobs from cottages to factories where they business owners can oversee the workers and account for their time. Some people considered the factory jobs a blessing while others considered it a hardship. The work day was long, conditions were unsanitary and food was sparse. Another negative effect of the Industrial Revolution was on the environment. The factories and industry has increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Manufacturing towns were built nearShow MoreRelatedThe Effects Of Industrial Revolution On Society1989 Words   |  8 PagesThe industrial revolution introduced new ideas and revelations for the technology we enjoy today. During the years between 1750 and 1914 people began to discover more innovative ways of producing goods, which in turn boosted their economy. The British and French had similar ideas about the industrial path, but due to the French Revolution, France had other issues to contend with whereas Britain continued to industrialise. The industrial Revolution certainly boosted the economy; however, the socialRead MoreEffects Of The Industrial Revolution On European Societies906 Words   |  4 PagesThe Industrial Revolution caused great change in the ways European countries produced goods. The Revolution encompassed the years 1750 through 1850, and generated many innovations and ideas that have changed European service industries forever. The effects of the Industrial Rev olution caused a dramatic change in the way European societies functioned. These changes in society caused by the Industrial Revolution initiated an unprecedented growth rate of the European middle class, which led to a sharpRead MoreImpact Of The Industrial Revolution On Capitalism And The Contemporary Society Essay1625 Words   |  7 PagesThe impact of the Industrial Revolution on Capitalism and the Contemporary Society, When looking into the past during the Industrial Revolution, there were many cause and effect events that occurred, the Industrial Revolution changed the lives of many, these changes in society were caused by the innovations of the time period, and the need for a more productive environment. There was a movement from an agricultural society to a manufacturing society; these changes affected the family’s abilityRead MoreThe Positives And Cons Of The Industrial Revolution835 Words   |  4 PagesIs the Industrial Revolution as Good as We Think It Is? Bill Gates once said, â€Å"If you go back to 1800, everybody was poor. I mean everybody. The Industrial Revolution kicked in, and a lot of countries benefited, but by no means everyone.† The Industrial Revolution was a period in the 18th century led by Great Britain that had a major influence in agriculture, scientific studies, manufacturing, and transportation. As said by Bill Gates, even though the Industrial Revolution benefited many partiesRead MoreIndustrial Revolution : Impact On Society1092 Words   |  5 PagesIndustrial Revolution: Impact on Society Chernyka Love HIST112 Professor Adam Howard American Military University 15 March 2015 The Industrial Revolution is a term used to describe a period characterized by a transition from old to new processes of manufacturing. This period occurred during the 18th and 19th century. The transition was seen to include movement from primitive hand production to the same type of production using faster more efficient means by use of machines. The era also featuredRead MorePositive and Negative Effects of Industrial Revolution Essay1043 Words   |  5 PagesPositive and Negative Effects of Industrial Revolution The Industrial Revolution began in England in the late 1700’s. The Industrial Revolution was a time of new inventions, products, and methods of work. The results of the Industrial Revolution led to many short and long-term positive and negative effects. These results have been assessed from many viewpoints such as the factory workers, the factory owners, the government, and other people who observed the conditions in industrial cities. One negativeRead MoreThe Industrial Revolution And The Effects On Women s Rights1569 Words   |  7 PagesThe Industrial Revolution and the Effects on Women s Rights The Industrial Revolution was one of the most important and productive periods of history. The Industrial Revolution has to do with the time between the late 18th century and mid-19th century where there were profound advances in production, manufacturing, and other fields of engineering. It began in Great Britain in the late 1700s which then spread to the United States and then to many other parts of the world. Societies were very ruralRead MoreEffects of the Industrial Revolution727 Words   |  3 PagesThe Industrial Revolution, lasting between the 18th and 19th century, profoundly affected the people of Europe, North America, and other regions of the world. The revolution produced new exciting technological innovations. As a result, the socioeconomic climate and cultural aspects of Europe and North America were altered in an unprecedented manner. Industrial opportunities also lured the population away from agrarian lifestyles to more urban populaces. The Industrial Revolution e xtensively changedRead MoreThe Impact of The British Revolution on Society Essay example546 Words   |  3 PagesThe British revolution had a great impact on the society. Various complicated machines tools were used in the production and rural-agricultural and commercial society to a progressive rural- industrial society, this period of time old ideas mere modified, not swept away and gradually new ideas took place. This thing helped Britain changing their city life, social class structure, the power of the British nation amongst rest of the world, the production of machinery, and the strength of the economyRead MoreThe Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Western Society1367 Words   |  6 PagesThe Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on Western society and the effects were numerous and mainly positive. The Industrial Revolution began in England in the 1790’s and spread throughout Europe and eventually to America. The extensive effects of the Industrial Revolution influenced almost every aspect of daily life and human society in some way. During this time period, widespread transportation such as railroads became available and important for the movement of goods and people. Also

Symptoms And Treatment Of Osteoporosis - 1192 Words

Physiology There are several conditions that contribute to osteoporosis other than the aging process that causes elders to lose bone density, to understand the correlation of the condition one should have a basic understanding of what osteoporosis is. As stated, osteoporosis is called a silent disease with an underlying origin that is undetected or misdiagnosed since the symptoms are so nondescript until the damage is done. This condition is characterized by decrease bone mass density (BMD), the principal progression is bone fragility with undetermined body fractures, and bone mineral density decrease with aging; defines osteoporosis which yields brittle bones found in both genders. Although, women experience this process more†¦show more content†¦Ms. J stated she had heartburn and used Mylanta for treatment. As suggested, Mylanta is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) used for gastric reflux with an aluminum base that lower stomach acid levels, blocking the absorption of calciu m and phosphates which decrease bone density. The researcher has established a link between long term use of (PPI) and osteoporosis, which is a major cause of hip fractures. (Kruse, 2011) When reviewing the medical records it was noted that the client received chemo along with radiation for breast cancer and glucocorticoid injection for chronic arthritis three times in the last 10 years. For instance, there is a link between women who were treated for breast cancer with chemotherapy, the reason given was the loss of ovarian function that drops the estrogen levels that had a protective effect on the bones. Chemotherapy also has a direct harmful effect on the bones, and breast cancer stimulates osteoclasts cell production, which role is to break down bone tissue. (NIH, n.d.) â€Å"Bone loss is one of the most important side effects of glucocorticoid use, even in low doses. The main effect of glucocorticoids on bone is inhibition of osteoblast function, leading to a decrease in bone formation and a glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis† (De Niji, 2015) Ms. J fractured her arm two years ago from a fall. One of the major causes of bone and hip fractures in senior adults are

Why Marijuana Should Be Illegal Free Essays

Tyler Wyrick Ms. Russo English 165. 25W 11 May 2010 E1 Why Marijuana should be Illegal In society today, many people are looking for a feeling of freedom. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Marijuana Should Be Illegal or any similar topic only for you Order Now Some go on vacation and spend money while others look to drugs. The sense of high that results from using marijuana acts as an escape from the stresses of everyday life. As a result, a tremendous number of Americans participate in the illicit use of marijuana. Our American society is facing a tremendous drug problem that will increase exponentially by the legalization of this drug. Marijuana should be illegal because it will cause an increase in drug users and drug related crimes, the short term and long term effects of marijuana on the body, and the effect it will have on the country. One of the consequences of legalization would be a tremendous increase in marijuana users. Right now with the use of illicit drugs comes the fear of law enforcement agents and punishment causes individuals to be too scared to try marijuana. However, if weed become legalized, the fear becomes nonexistent and the number of users skyrockets. Legalized marijuana provides an ease of access to the drug, which in turn, promotes an increase in sales and use. An increase in marijuana use will also result in an increase in drug related crimes. Supporters of the legalization of weed believe that crime and violence would decrease if the drug is legal. Statistics show that forty percent of those arrested for committing a crime tested positive for the use of drugs at the time of their arrest. Making drugs more readily available could potentially propel more individuals into a life of crime and violence. Many marijuana users turn to crime to pay for their habit. They are stimulated by drugs and therefore act violently. Sold legally, marijuana will become easy for users to buy it around the corner, which would increase the already existing problem of crime. It is mentioned by Forbes that every year drug lords make billions of dollars from marijuana business, and those promoting legalization believe it will wipe out their major sources of funds. Drug use is a matter of supply and demand. As long as demand exists, someone is going to supply it either legally or illegally. Supporters of legalization believe that if the government regulates drugs such as marijuana by imposing taxes, then the black market will be eliminated. Not many users can afford to buy high priced drugs such as marijuana. As a result, people will be forced to go to drug gangs who sell marijuana under the market price. In addition, children and teenagers will obviously be banned from purchasing marijuana, just as they are prohibited from buying beer and liquor. Nevertheless, there will be drug pushers who will continue to encourage the youth and try to get them hooked to marijuana. Hence, legalization of marijuana will encourage a growing criminal black market. Marijuana is also very bad for ones overall health. Persistent use will damage lungs and airways and raise the risk of cancer. There is just as much exposure to cancer-causing chemicals from smoking one marijuana joint as smoking five tobacco cigarettes. There is evidence that marijuana may limit the ability of the immune system to fight infection and disease. This drug also causes severe side effects to the brain and body. Smoking marijuana can cause a person to lose their memory. Marijuana also has many short-term psychological and physical effects. These reactions usually last for three to five hours after a person has smoked marijuana. The psychological reaction, known as a high, consists of changes in the user’s feelings and thoughts. Mainly THC causes such changes. Many people usually smoke marijuana in cigarettes or pipes, but it also can be mixed with food and beverages. The concentration of the marijuana can affect how a person reacts to using the drug. The effects of a marijuana high vary from person to person and from one time to another in the same individual. In most cases, the high consists of a dreamy relaxed state in which users seem more aware of their senses and feel that time is moving slowly. Sometimes however, marijuana produces a feeling of panic and dread. The different reactions result partly from the concentration of THC in the marijuana. Other factors such as the setting in which marijuana is used, the user’s expectations, personality, and mood also affect a person’s reaction to the drug. Long-term effects of marijuana are not completely known, but studies have shown that some people who have used marijuana regularly for several months or longer have developed serious long-term problems. Among males, marijuana use can reduce the production of sperm and the male sex hormone testosterone. Among females, marijuana can cause menstrual irregularity and reduced fertility. Extended use of marijuana also has a long-term psychological effect on many people. These individuals lose interest in everything. They become unmotivated and detached. Another impact on health is that marijuana is a gateway drug. People that smoke marijuana for the first time feel that bringing themselves to actually try pot is the hardest part. Once an individual’s nerves are now calm about trying marijuana, they will now find that trying harder drugs won’t be as difficult to think about. Once their attitude on drug use is changed people will not hesitate to experiment with new harder drugs just as they did with marijuana. The Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University found adolescents who smoke pot 85 times more likely to use cocaine than their non–pot smoking peers. 0 percent of young people who use marijuana before they turn 15 later go on to use cocaine. A user of marijuana will eventually want to feel a new or better high causing them to resort to drugs that have much more of a negative effect on the body. Not all drug users will immediately begin using heroin, but once they are taking drugs it is very difficult for them to quit. For some, it will begin with sim ple painkillers and then possibly cocaine. With each step further into the world of drugs the user will find it harder to return. The high becomes an escape from reality. It becomes a release from the pressures of everyday life. With time, the period between highs becomes shortened due to the inability for users to face daily tasks. Soon, they become addicts living for the next high. Why? Because marijuana, a â€Å"harmless, organic drug,† opened the door to more possibilities. Next, legalization is neither a reasonable nor rational policy for this country. One of the biggest concerns about the legalization argument is the mixed message it sends to our young people. The legalization will imply a nonjudgmental attitude about drugs. The public’s attitude must change toward drugs and focus on prevention and treatment of drug abuse while maintaining the laws that make the drugs illegal. By focusing time and resources on the dangers of marijuana use, we are setting ourselves up for a better society as a whole. Reducing societal acceptance of weed use would allow Americans to raise a generation that could make a healthy contribution to the country. Then, the thought of job opportunities could be an issue. Think about the hundreds of thousands of others who are daily and heroically involved in the continuous war on drugs. Police officers, who are constantly meeting their quota by busting marijuana related crimes, would now have to sit back and watch the future of America get high on the streets hoping they wont continue on in to the drug world. Marijuana is illegal for many reasons. Most of the people that are pro-legalization will not use it for medical use or are at all interested in this nations economy. The ugly truth is that most want it legal merely because they want to use it. The drug problem America faces now would severely increase if marijuana were legalized. Health bills would go up due to medical issues involving weed, drug related crimes would increase, and legalizing the drug would change America’s attitude on drugs completely and open the door to drugs far worse than weed. The war on drugs would just be getting started. How to cite Why Marijuana Should Be Illegal, Papers

Vaccination Should Be Mandatory Or A Choice -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Vaccination Should Be Mandatory Or A Choice? Answer: Introducation According to Catholic Social Teaching (CST), the shared responsibility for common good, states that it is the right of every person to have optimal access of resources present in society in order to live a fulfilling life (Felten, 2013). For optimal utilization of resources, there must remain a proper balance between the personal possession and community resources and this balance will help to maintain equitable distribution of resources. The common good can be obtained when citizens of the society work in unison to uplift the overall well-being of the mass (Felten, 2013). The following essay aims to highlight the global issue of vaccination and how it has failed to highlight the need of the common good. The essay then tries to throw light on how the proper awareness of vaccination can be generated without hampering the shared responsibility of common good and human rights of Catholic Social Teaching. At the end, the essay collates recommendation regarding how community engagement an d advocacy can be used as model to promote proper awareness of vaccination among the mass. Vaccination or immunization is common good for all the mass present in the society with a special mention to the children. Vaccination helps in the prevention of the infectious, recurrent and contagious disease like measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough (Bar et al., 2014). However, vaccination is still a tabo among the parents. Parents suffer from lack of knowledge and prioritize rumours spread against vaccination. Parents are of the opinion that vaccination is unsafe and avoidance is the best policy to keep their children medically secured (Yaqub et al., 2014). This mindset has drastically decreased the rate of childhood vaccination in Australia (Diekema, 2012). According to reports, 1 out of 10 Australian parents nurture the belief that autisim results from vaccination (Diekema, 2012; Kaufman et al., 2012). Malcolm Turnbull in order to cope up with this situation made strict policy focusing the vaccination, according to this policy, vaccine refusers will be e xempted from special children benefits (ABC News, 2017). This policy though framed in the common good of the community and goes against the human right principle of the CST. Since the rule is forcefully imposed, the decision making choice of a childs guardian, which is the right of every parent is getting hampered. Moreover, this forceful imposition for the sake of common good is turn hampering the cause of the common good (Gheaus, 2016). For instance, According to reports published in ABC news, 150,000 children were incompletely vaccinated in the year 2013 and of them 3700 were the vaccine objectors (ABC News, 2017). This improper vaccination resulting out of forced imposition is again hampering the act of common good and human right as it is the right of all people to lead to a health and fulfilling lives. So in order to promote the concept of vaccination, so that there remains no scope of imposition, proper awareness in the field of vaccination must be generated via promoting illiteracy. This is again in turn will be beneficial for the act of the common good as education and health related awareness is the main pillar of success behind the common good (Johri et al., 2015). Such illiteracy and awareness campaign will designed in such a way that it does not hamper the cultural thoughts and the spiritual beliefs of the person as it is the right of every individual to nurture their spiritual thought and cultural values. Apart from the unwilling people, there is a large group of people who are willing to vaccinate their children, but are unable to do so due to lack of proper financial backup and unavailability of adequate vaccine supply. So for the sake of the common good, vaccines must be made accessible at low cost without any compromise in the standardised quality and dose (Rowlands, 20 14). The global issue of ignorance of vaccination among parents and not regarding it as mandatory for their children is a subject of great argument. According to the principle of human dignity, humans decision should be respected and they should be given the freedom to make their own decision. According to this principle, vaccination should be a choice for people. However, according to the principle of common good, well-being of individual people is essential for the well-being of the community (Thompson, 2017). There is need to increase the uptake of vaccination and make parents aware about vaccination as a necessity because vaccination is the most effective way to control diseases and protect children from preventable disease (Brnighausen et al., 2014). Hence, solution to the problem is necessary because increase in rate of vaccination will enhance health and well-being of people and reduce rate of hospitalizations in children too. This is also proved by Snchez-Uribe et al., (2016) as t he study proved that universalization of rotavirus vaccination reduced childhood diarrhea related mortality and hospitalization in children. The first strategy that can change parents attitude towards vaccination includes taking community engagement initiative. This is essential as part of common good responsibility and social justice for people. However, poor perception of parents towards vaccination is one challenge in realizing the common good act of increasing uptake of vaccination in community (Vezzosi, Santagati, Angelillo, (2017). Hence, to promote positive attitude utility of vaccination, there is a need to implement outreach and engagement programs in community so that parents get to know all about different kinds of vaccination and their role in preventing diseases (Riesch et al., 2013). Health care provider needs to be engaged so that parents can get right advice regarding vaccination. The advantage of direct engagement between parent and health care provider apart from other source of engagement is that health care providers are better positioned to answer all queries of students and clarify their wrong perce ptions related to risk of vaccination. Such community engagement strategies may also increase parents knowledge regarding vaccination and affect their decision to vaccinate their children in the future (Dixon et al., 2017). Exclusive educational campaigns can also be arranged so that parents learn about the utility of different forms of vaccination for their children. Apart from community engagement strategy, another step that can help to realize the common good goal of improving parents attitude towards vaccination includes taking advocacy strategy. Advocacy strategy is related to increasing investment and funding for immunization. This will ensure that vaccines are available to all and no one is derived from vaccination (Plotkin, Mahmoud Farrar, 2015). In countries like Africa, inadequate funding is the main reason for low vaccination coverage. Hence, any education and awareness initiative related to vaccination may fail when step like maximizing funding for vaccination is not taken. Another barrier that may affect the rate of vaccination is poor quality of immunization services. Therefore, another advocacy strategy that can promote improvement in vaccination coverage includes improve human resource training on administrating vaccines, introducing appropriate cold chain maintenance and vaccine storage facility and evaluating vaccination service s on a regular basis (WHO, 2018). Such step is likely to promote uptake of vaccination and increase peoples interest in routine vaccination. In response to the issue of poor attitude towards vaccination, advocacy and community engagement strategies are considered most effective to address the problem because such strategies provides the right resource to fill the gap that exist related to vaccination coverage. The success of such strategy is also dependent on proper collaboration with partners like health care staffs, vaccination services, public health staffs and health promotion staffs. This is effective in addressing the challenges and promoting advocacy for vaccination in community. Thus from the above discussion it can be concluded that vaccination is good for the proper health back up of the upcoming generation. Hence proper awareness and literacy programs must be framed by the nurses and other health care professionals in order to increases the rate of vaccination mong the children. However, such literacy and awareness program must be designed in such a way that it may not hamper the common good and human rights of the person based on CST. References ABC News. (2017). Turnbull wants unvaccinated kids banned from child care. [online] Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-12/government-pushes-to-ban-unvaccinated-children-from-childcare/8347040 [Accessed 24 Jan. 2018]. ABC News. (2017). Victoria to close loophole for 'dodgy doctors' giving vaccination exemptions. [online] Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-15/child-vaccination-exemption-letters-from-gps-no-longer-accepted/9151768 [Accessed 24 Jan. 2018]. Brnighausen, T., Bloom, D. E., Cafiero-Fonseca, E. T., OBrien, J. C. (2014). Valuing vaccination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,111(34), 12313-12319. Bart, M. J., Harris, S. R., Advani, A., Arakawa, Y., Bottero, D., Bouchez, V., ... Gaillard, M. E. (2014). Global population structure and evolution of Bordetella pertussis and their relationship with vaccination.MBio,5(2), e01074-14. Diekema, D. S. (2012). Improving childhood vaccination rates.New England Journal of Medicine,366(5), 391-393. Dixon, B. E., Kasting, M. L., Wilson, S., Kulkarni, A., Zimet, G. D., Downs, S. M. (2017). Health care providers perceptions of use and influence of clinical decision support reminders: qualitative study following a randomized trial to improve HPV vaccination rates.BMC medical informatics and decision making,17(1), 119. Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL.Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal,1(1), 121-125. Gheaus, A. (2016). The right to parent and duties concerning future generations. Johri, M., Subramanian, S. V., Sylvestre, M. P., Dudeja, S., Chandra, D., Kon, G. K., ... Pahwa, S. (2015). Association between maternal health literacy and child vaccination in India: a cross-sectional study.J Epidemiol Community Health, jech-2014. Kaufman, J., Synnot, A., Hill, S., Willis, N., Horey, D., Lin, V., ... Robinson, P. (2012). Face to face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.status and date: New, published in, (8). Plotkin, S. A., Mahmoud, A. A., Farrar, J. (2015). Establishing a global vaccine-development fund.New England Journal of Medicine,373(4), 297-300. Riesch, S. K., Ngui, E. M., Ehlert, C., Miller, M. K., Cronk, C. A., Leuthner, S., ... Durkin, M. S. (2013). Community outreach and engagement strategies from the Wisconsin study center of the national children's study.Public Health Nursing,30(3), 254-265. Rowlands, G. (2014). Health literacy: ways to maximise the impact and effectiveness of vaccination information.Human vaccines immunotherapeutics,10(7), 2130-2135. Snchez-Uribe, E., Esparza-Aguilar, M., Parashar, U. D., Richardson, V. (2016). Sustained reduction of childhood diarrhea-related mortality and hospitalizations in Mexico after rotavirus vaccine universalization.Clinical Infectious Diseases,62(suppl_2), S133-S139. Thompson, M.J., 2017. 9 The common good as a principle of social justice.The Good Life Beyond Growth: New Perspectives. Vezzosi, L., Santagati, G., Angelillo, I. F. (2017). Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of parents towards varicella and its vaccination.BMC infectious diseases,17(1), 172. WHO (2018).Strategies to increase the demand for childhood vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Who.int. Retrieved 24 January 2018, from https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/93/5/14-146951/en/ Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N., Chataway, J. (2014). Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review.Social Science Medicine,112, 1-11.